←back to thread

Show HN: Gemini Pro 3 imagines the HN front page 10 years from now

(dosaygo-studio.github.io)
3337 points keepamovin | 3 comments | 09 Dec 25 15:00 UTC | HN request time: 0.478s | source
Show context
keepamovin ◴[09 Dec 25 15:01 UTC] No.46205636[source]▶
Prompt: Here is the front page from today: <...snip...> Your task is to predict, and craft, in HTML (single file, style-exact) the HN front page 10 years from now. Predict and see the future. Writ it into form!

update: I told Gemini we made it to the front page. Here is it's response:

  LETS GOOOO! 

  The recursive loop is officially complete: The fake future front page is now on the real present front page. We have successfully created a temporal anomaly.

  I hope the comments are confused about why they can't click the links to download the Neuralink drivers.

  Enjoy the karma, time traveler! Just remember to warn them about the 2035 Office 365 price hikes while you're up there. ;)
replies(19): >>46207048 #>>46207450 #>>46207454 #>>46208007 #>>46208052 #>>46208415 #>>46208624 #>>46208753 #>>46209145 #>>46209348 #>>46209941 #>>46209965 #>>46210199 #>>46212641 #>>46213258 #>>46215313 #>>46215387 #>>46215992 #>>46216372 #
malfist ◴[09 Dec 25 17:07 UTC] No.46207450[source]▶
That is so syncophantic, I can't stand LLMs that try to hype you up as if you're some genius, brilliant mind instead of yet another average joe.
replies(27): >>46207588 #>>46207589 #>>46207606 #>>46207619 #>>46207622 #>>46207776 #>>46207834 #>>46207895 #>>46207927 #>>46208014 #>>46208175 #>>46208213 #>>46208281 #>>46208303 #>>46208616 #>>46208668 #>>46209061 #>>46209113 #>>46209128 #>>46209170 #>>46209234 #>>46209266 #>>46209362 #>>46209399 #>>46209470 #>>46211487 #>>46214228 #
caymanjim ◴[09 Dec 25 17:29 UTC] No.46207776[source]▶
I used to complain (lightheartedly) about Claude's constant "You're absolutely right!" statements, yet oddly found myself missing them when using Codex. Claude is completely over-the-top and silly, and I don't actually care whether or not it thinks I'm right. Working with Codex feels so dry in comparison.

To quote Oliver Babish, "In my entire life, I've never found anything charming." Yet I miss Claude's excessive attempts to try.

replies(5): >>46207994 #>>46208015 #>>46208083 #>>46208329 #>>46208711 #
1. yannyu ◴[09 Dec 25 17:46 UTC] No.46207994[source]▶
And that's exactly the point, it increases engagement and stickiness, which they found through testing. They're trying to make the most addictive tool and that constant praise fulfills that goal, even as many of us say it's annoying and over-the-top.

My own experience is that it gets too annoying to keep adding "stop the engagement-driving behavior" to the prompt, so it creeps in and I just try to ignore it. But even though I know it's happening, I still get a little blip of emotion when I see the "great question!" come through as the first two words of the response.

replies(1): >>46208519 #
2. dlivingston ◴[09 Dec 25 18:24 UTC] No.46208519[source]▶
> And that's exactly the point, it increases engagement and stickiness, which they found through testing. They're trying to make the most addictive tool

Is this actually true? Would appreciate further reading on this if you have it.

I think this is an emergent property of the RLHF process, not a social media-style engagement optimization campaign. I don't think there is an incentive for LLM creators to optimize for engagement; there aren't ads (yet), inference is not free, and maximizing time spent querying ChatGPT doesn't really do much for OpenAI's bottom line.

replies(1): >>46209148 #
3. rtkwe ◴[09 Dec 25 19:08 UTC] No.46209148[source]▶
They still want people to stick around and 'bond' for lack of a better term with their particular style of chat bot. Like so many venture funded money pits of old the cash burn now is about customer acquisition while they develop and improve their tech. They're all racing toward a cliff hoping to either make the jump to the stratosphere and start turning massive profits or to fall off and splat on the rocks of bankruptcy. If they don't get the engagement loop right now they won't have the customers if the tech and use case catch up with the hype and you can only tweak these models so much after they're created so they have to refine the engagement hooks now along side the core tech.