←back to thread

3337 points keepamovin | 2 comments | | HN request time: 2.714s | source
Show context
lagniappe ◴[] No.46206905[source]
This suffers from a common pitfall of LLM's, context taint. You can see it is obviously the front page from today with slight "future" variation, the result ends up being very formulaic.
replies(11): >>46207006 #>>46207026 #>>46207056 #>>46207057 #>>46207199 #>>46207372 #>>46207564 #>>46207766 #>>46208807 #>>46209243 #>>46211882 #
teekert ◴[] No.46207026[source]
Yeah that’s very true, but I still think it’s pretty funny and original.
replies(2): >>46207079 #>>46207691 #
glenstein ◴[] No.46207691[source]
The problem is not that it fails to be cheeky, but that "its funny" is depressing in a context where there was a live question of whether it's a sincere attempt at prediction.

When I see "yeah but it's funny" it feels like a retrofitted repair job, patching up a first pass mental impression that accepted it at face value and wants to preserve a kind of sense of psychological endorsement of the creative product.

replies(1): >>46207980 #
1. jacobr1 ◴[] No.46207980[source]
Honestly it feels like what I, or many of my colleagues would do if given the assignment. Take the current front page, or a summary of the top tropes or recurring topics, revise them for 1 or 2 steps of technical progress and call it a day. It isn't assignment to predict the future, it is an assignment to predict HN, which is a narrower thing.
replies(1): >>46211760 #
2. glenstein ◴[] No.46211760[source]
Right, because you would read the teacher and realize they don't want you to actually complete the assignment to the letter. So you would do jokes in response to a request for prediction.