←back to thread

Has the cost of building software dropped 90%?

(martinalderson.com)
413 points martinald | 1 comments | 08 Dec 25 19:00 UTC | HN request time: 0.194s | source
Show context
nine_k ◴[08 Dec 25 20:15 UTC] No.46197061[source]▶
Had the cost of building custom software dropped 90%, we would be seeing a flurry of low-cost, decent-quality SaaS offering all over the marketplace, possibly undercutting some established players.

From where I sit, right now, this does not seem to be the case.

This is as if writing down the code is not the biggest problem, or the biggest time sink, of building software.

replies(28): >>46197121 #>>46197162 #>>46197191 #>>46197790 #>>46198132 #>>46198182 #>>46198282 #>>46198425 #>>46198498 #>>46198608 #>>46198655 #>>46198747 #>>46198991 #>>46199214 #>>46199310 #>>46199646 #>>46199706 #>>46201118 #>>46201177 #>>46202111 #>>46202477 #>>46202670 #>>46203360 #>>46204030 #>>46204863 #>>46204917 #>>46207989 #>>46214063 #
1. theshrike79 ◴[09 Dec 25 12:07 UTC] No.46204030[source]▶
No no, that's not how it works.

The crap I build _replaces_ someone else's SaaS (or free open source) product.

They solve my exact problem and nothing else and they follow the ways I like to use my software, with no fancy Dockerised WebUIs etc.

I have exactly zero intention of putting any of that shit out there as any kind of service with user accounts and billing and all of the associated stress. A few of them might be something I could sell as a SaaS offering, but I'm not interested in it at all.

Most of them are on my Github though for anyone to get and use as they see fit, but then it's up to them if the vibe coded program does something it shouldn't :)