←back to thread

AI should only run as fast as we can catch up

(higashi.blog)
196 points yuedongze | 1 comments | 08 Dec 25 17:38 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
blauditore ◴[08 Dec 25 18:26 UTC] No.46195811[source]▶
All these engineers who claim to write most code through AI - I wonder what kind of codebase that is. I keep on trying, but it always ends up producing superficially okay-looking code, but getting nuances wrong. Also fails to fix them (just changes random stuff) if pointed to said nuances.

I work on a large product with two decades of accumulated legacy, maybe that's the problem. I can see though how generating and editing a simple greenfield web frontend project could work much better, as long as actual complexity is low.

replies(16): >>46195970 #>>46195979 #>>46196044 #>>46196111 #>>46196149 #>>46196181 #>>46196747 #>>46197925 #>>46198024 #>>46198073 #>>46198272 #>>46198478 #>>46199426 #>>46200435 #>>46202288 #>>46207763 #
1. mrtksn ◴[09 Dec 25 07:39 UTC] No.46202288[source]▶
So far I found that AI is very good at writing the code as in translating english to computer code.

Instead of dealing with intricacies of directly writing the code, I explain the AI what are we trying to achieve next and what approach I prefer. This way I am still on top of it, I am able to understand the quality of the code it generated and I’m the one who integrates everything.

So far I found the tools that are supposed to be able to edit the whole codebase at once be useless. I instantly loose perspective when the AI IDE fiddles with multiple code blocks and does some magic. The chatbot interface is superior for me as the control stays with me and I still follow the code writing step by step.