←back to thread

366 points gniting | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.253s | source

Previously: Netflix to Acquire Warner Bros - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46160315 (1333 comments)
Show context
magicalhippo ◴[] No.46192486[source]
I brought popcorn, who are we rooting for?
replies(5): >>46192833 #>>46193212 #>>46193404 #>>46193585 #>>46200085 #
Larrikin ◴[] No.46192833[source]
The best outcome would be for all of the bids to fail, all the streaming services would bleed money due to people sick of the siloing, and for there to be multiple streaming services competing on experience because they all have access to the same catalog.

The second best outcome would be the cartoon villain Larry not getting what he wants.

replies(3): >>46192985 #>>46194495 #>>46200972 #
nubinetwork ◴[] No.46192985[source]
I honestly don't think cbs paramount would be any better, if anything, wb content would be further paywalled and tiered off
replies(1): >>46193418 #
Spivak ◴[] No.46193418[source]
Which is why the model that would actually be good for consumers and the model that absolutely no content producer wants which is splitting content creation from distribution isn't going to happen. Let a bunch of companies compete over being the best streaming platform and then let those companies all compete for licensing deals for content.

I think a big copyright holders in a strange way actually don't want a repeat of cable. They want all content to be exclusive by default to their own streaming service.

replies(2): >>46196798 #>>46200976 #
1. raw_anon_1111 ◴[] No.46200976[source]
> no content producer wants which is splitting content creation from distribution isn't going to happen.

Sony does that now