←back to thread

IBM to acquire Confluent

(www.confluent.io)
443 points abd12 | 1 comments | 08 Dec 25 13:43 UTC | HN request time: 0.226s | source
Show context
b33f ◴[08 Dec 25 14:50 UTC] No.46192837[source]▶
Maybe a good time to consider alternatives https://www.redpanda.com/compare/redpanda-vs-kafka
replies(3): >>46193074 #>>46193478 #>>46194417 #
dangoldin ◴[08 Dec 25 16:40 UTC] No.46194417[source]▶
I led the engineering team of a large adtech company (TripleLift - order of hundreds of billions of events/day) and we evolved from self hosting Kafka, to paying a vendor (Instacluster), to migrating to RedPanda.

RedPanda was a huge win for us. Confluent never made sense to us since we were always so cost conscious but the complexity/risk of managing a critical part of our infra was always something I worried about. RedPanda was able to handle both for us - cheaper than Kafka hosting vendors with significantly better performance. We were pretty early customers but was a huge win for us.

replies(3): >>46195834 #>>46200814 #>>46204387 #
1. easel ◴[09 Dec 25 03:07 UTC] No.46200814[source]▶
Same, small martech company. RedPanda works and the pricing allows actually using the service, plus the “source available” isn’t that limiting if you prefer to run your own stuff. Definitely glad to be off kafka prior to this news!