←back to thread

288 points Bezod | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
superducktoes ◴[] No.46194836[source]
Thanks for sharing my site. Happy to answer any questions
replies(5): >>46195096 #>>46195114 #>>46196131 #>>46197986 #>>46203982 #
monerozcash ◴[] No.46195096[source]
Don't have questions, but your blog is very cool.

A bit over a decade ago I used to spend a lot of time hacking North Korean web infrastructure, I mostly found that they tended to have firewalling around almost all boxes exposed to the global internet and usually had pretty impressive reaction times if you tried to access the country intranet through a compromised web server.

I've always wondered how successful NSA and the likes have been at infiltrating DPRK networks, as it would inherently be fairly easy to detect any sketchy traffic from the outside. I wonder if the recent NYT story essentially confirms that difficulty.

Regarding the NSA and DPRK, there's this document from 2007 least https://www.eff.org/files/2015/02/03/20150117-spiegel-fifth_...

I guess I have a question after all: I'm not exactly clear on how NK treats end-user devices. Do you know if the endpoints used by NK based remote workers have internet and intranet access at the same time? If they do, such an endpoint could offer an easy and stealthy channel to access the intranet.

replies(3): >>46195380 #>>46195393 #>>46199943 #
1. anonu ◴[] No.46199943[source]
> this document from 2007

Interesting document - confirming "everyone spies on everyone". Is this from some sort of corporate NSA chat room?

replies(1): >>46200114 #
2. monerozcash ◴[] No.46200114[source]
It's like the NSA Reddit, they've got memes and up- and downvotes.

Some excerpts from a seemingly unreleased Snowden leak (from Dark mirror: Edward Snowden and the American Surveillance State):

> “Why is a scoop of potatoes larger than a scoop of eggs in the cafeteria?” a contributor named Michael wondered one day. Paul jumped in to play the troll. “Let me be the first to down-vote you,” Paul wrote, naming several pedantic reasons. A side debate erupted: should Michael’s post be down-voted, flagged, or removed? Clyde returned to the topic at hand with a facetious theory that scoop volume is proportional to the relative size of potatoes and eggs themselves. In that case, Scott replied, what would happen if “we served eggs that were bigger than potatoes, like of an Ostrich?” Someone proposed a uniform system, “One Spoon to scoop them all,” an homage to Lord of the Rings. Punsters demanded the “inside scoop” and lamented the waste of time on “small potatoes.”

Gotta say, it's pretty disappointing that Gellman, Greenwald, Poltras et. al. have been so stingy with these documents. It's definitely starting to have been long enough for them to just dump everything.