←back to thread

Is Gen X the Greatest Generation?

(www.nytimes.com)
22 points tomcam | 2 comments | 08 Dec 25 19:45 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
9rx ◴[08 Dec 25 21:10 UTC] No.46197690[source]▶
> Online, where generational warfare is waged these days, many hold that the real Gen X range is 1961 to 1981 [...] The stakes of the argument are high: No one wants to be a millennial or a boomer.

Millennial wasn't a generation. It referred to those who were set to graduate from high school in the year 2000. Generation Y was the name of the generation that followed Generation X.

This is why there is debate between 1981 and 1982. It is dependent on how one's school system was setup. In my jurisdiction, the 1981 cohort is who graduated from high school in 2000. In other jurisdictions, it was those born in 1982.

So, never fear, those who are afraid of being labelled millennials. The window is much smaller than the article lets on.

replies(1): >>46198660 #
1. brailsafe ◴[08 Dec 25 22:42 UTC] No.46198660[source]▶
> Millennial wasn't a generation.

It's as much of a generation as people broadly accept it to be, and I'd think a majority of people who bother to have an opinion don't attribute the delineating factor to the specific criteria of graduating during that exact year. Ironically, my sense of Gen Xers is that they're entirely defined by closely associating with their high school culture and not being boomers, who incidentally created a majority of Gen X culture.

Boomers are the selfish entitled "me" generation who had it the easiest economically, hold all the wealth now, and have killed the economy, Gen Xers are the latchkey kids who we forgot about and yet created the biggest tech companies we all rely on (carrying in the boomers footsteps), Millenials are the snowflakes who grew up on the cusp of the burgeoning internet, were given trophies for losing and yet are more competent and educated than anyone before, and will be responsible for paying for the boomers as they die through taxes and sacrifices (aka "The we're fucked, but like actually" generation), and then there's the rest who carry some of the same millenial issues (because damn those boomers, and the "don't call us boomers" generation are still out ruining everything) but were born late enough that they don't remember 911 or the millennium and have never known a life without the internet or something

replies(1): >>46200026 #
2. 9rx ◴[09 Dec 25 01:01 UTC] No.46200026[source]▶
> It's as much of a generation as people broadly accept it to be

It has become a generation, but it wasn't. For those who are pedantically concerned with not being a millennial, they can take solace in knowing that they'd only be a millennial if they, as a student, were set to graduate in 2000.