←back to thread

IBM to acquire Confluent

(www.confluent.io)
443 points abd12 | 2 comments | 08 Dec 25 13:43 UTC | HN request time: 0.072s | source
Show context
hadrien01 ◴[08 Dec 25 14:48 UTC] No.46192816[source]▶
Genuine question: how did the IBM acquisitions of Red Hat and HashiCorp turn out?

For Red Hat, there's no longer an official "public" distribution of RHEL, but apart from that they seemingly have been left alone and able to continue to develop their own products. But that's only my POV as a user of OSS Red Hat products at home and of RHEL and OpenShift at work.

replies(8): >>46192864 #>>46192912 #>>46193004 #>>46193010 #>>46193433 #>>46198058 #>>46201336 #>>46202389 #
1. HashiCorps ◴[08 Dec 25 21:43 UTC] No.46198058[source]▶
Former-Hashi employee here: there's a clear prioritization of enterprise products. So much so that I would not be surprised if they stopped supporting the Open Source projects entirely. That would be a big boost for the forks.

Red Hat has far more autonomy. We are not structured the same.

On the HR side — many good people are leaving; new hires have to be on-site for 3 days and located in 4 "strategic" locations in the US.

replies(1): >>46228804 #
2. thayne ◴[11 Dec 25 07:58 UTC] No.46228804[source]▶
That's really bad news for projects that don't (yet?) have significant forks, like consul and vagrant.