←back to thread

336 points mohi-kalantari | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
kayhantolga ◴[] No.46195479[source]
As a .NET developer who actually likes some Microsoft products, I can say this: the Copilot series is the worst thing they've shipped since Internet Explorer—and honestly, it might overtake it. The sad part is they had a huge head start before competitors gained access to powerful models, yet this is what we got.

If you haven’t seen how bad it is, here’s one example: Copilot Terminal. In theory, it should help you with terminal commands. Sounds great. In practice, it installs a chat panel on the right side of your terminal that has zero integration with the terminal itself. It can’t read what’s written, it can’t send commands, it has no context, and the model response time is awful. What’s the point of a “terminal assistant” that can’t actually assist the terminal?

This lack of real integration is basically the core design of most Copilot products. If you’ve been lucky enough to avoid them, good for you. If your company forces you to use them because they’re bundled with a Microsoft license, I genuinely feel your pain.

replies(8): >>46196100 #>>46196148 #>>46196271 #>>46196343 #>>46196418 #>>46196569 #>>46196754 #>>46197123 #
1. lll-o-lll ◴[] No.46196569[source]
Works good in Teams. Summarises meetings, collects action items. It’s pretty great actually.

I don’t know how many forests we are burning to have a digital secretary, but surely the environment can take one more for the team?

replies(1): >>46196624 #
2. ares623 ◴[] No.46196624[source]
“It’s just like your toaster”