←back to thread

AMD GPU Debugger

(thegeeko.me)
276 points ibobev | 7 comments | 08 Dec 25 16:06 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
Show context
snarfy ◴[08 Dec 25 17:28 UTC] No.46195053[source]▶
Is there not an official tool from AMD?
replies(2): >>46195175 #>>46195264 #
almostgotcaught ◴[08 Dec 25 17:42 UTC] No.46195264[source]▶
> After searching for solutions, I came across rocgdb, a debugger for AMD’s ROCm environment.

It's like the 3rd sentence in the blog post.......

replies(1): >>46195451 #
djmips ◴[08 Dec 25 17:57 UTC] No.46195451[source]▶
to be fair it wasn't clear that was an official AMD debugger and besides that's only for debugging ROCm applications.
replies(2): >>46195764 #>>46196474 #
1. almostgotcaught ◴[08 Dec 25 19:23 UTC] No.46196474[source]▶
this sentence doesn't make any sense a) ROCm is an AMD product b) ROCm "applications" are GPU "applications".
replies(3): >>46196704 #>>46196725 #>>46196746 #
2. ◴[08 Dec 25 19:45 UTC] No.46196704[source]▶
3. fc417fc802 ◴[08 Dec 25 19:47 UTC] No.46196725[source]▶
But not all GPU applications are ROCm applications (I would think).

I can certainly understand OP's confusion. Navigating parts of the GPU ecosystem that are new to you can be incredibly confusing.

4. thegeeko ◴[08 Dec 25 19:50 UTC] No.46196746[source]▶
there's 2 AMD KMD(kernel mode drivers) in linux: amdkfd and amdgpu .. the graphics applications use the amdgpu which is not supported by amdgdb .. amdgdb also has the limitation of requiring dwarf and and mesa/amd UMDs doesn't generate that ..
replies(1): >>46203244 #
5. dman ◴[09 Dec 25 10:06 UTC] No.46203244[source]▶
Do you know which one rocm uses?
replies(1): >>46203567 #
6. thegeeko ◴[09 Dec 25 11:06 UTC] No.46203567{3}[source]▶
amdkfd
replies(1): >>46219123 #
7. dman ◴[10 Dec 25 15:49 UTC] No.46219123{4}[source]▶
Thank you!