←back to thread

IBM to acquire Confluent

(www.confluent.io)
443 points abd12 | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
JSR_FDED ◴[] No.46192996[source]
IBM have an absolutely stellar record of blowing acquisitions. The highly motivated newly acquired team will be in honeymoon phase for 3 months, and then it slowly dawns on them that they’ve joined an unbelievably rigid organization where things like customer satisfaction and great products don’t matter at all. Then they’ll be in shock and disbelief at the mind boggling Byzantine rules and internal systems they have to use, whose sole purpose is to make sure nobody does anything. Finally, the core IBM sales force will start to make demands on them and will short to ground any vestiges of energy, time, opportunity and motivation they might have left. The good team members will leave and join a former business partner, or decide to spend more time with the family. They’ll meet often at the beginning to relive the glory days of pre-acquisition and recount times where they went went above and beyond for that important early customer. But then these meetings will become fewer and fewer. Finally they’ll find a way of massaging their resumes to cast the last years as being “at the heart of AI infrastructure”.
replies(19): >>46193119 #>>46193145 #>>46193189 #>>46193200 #>>46193687 #>>46193926 #>>46194210 #>>46194488 #>>46194624 #>>46194792 #>>46194907 #>>46195325 #>>46195480 #>>46195863 #>>46196268 #>>46196481 #>>46196910 #>>46196978 #>>46197436 #
embedding-shape ◴[] No.46193145[source]
Surely by now everyone, including non-developers and non-software people, know exactly what IBM is, and you don't sell to IBM/join IBM without knowing exactly what's about to happen. No one joins IBM today and thinks there will be a huge focus on customer satisfaction or focus on great product design, it's all about squeezing maximum profit out of products until you need to discontinue them because you chased away all of the customers.
replies(1): >>46193973 #
oersted ◴[] No.46193973[source]
Not wrong but the image that people are painting in the comments is getting close to a caricature now.

The stuff IBM is doing on Quantum Computing is serious cutting-edge science and engineering for instance. The R&D they are doing on semiconductors on their 2nm and sub-2nm processes is also impressive and hardcore tech. They are doing a bunch of progress on post-quantum cryptography and homomorphic encryption. They've fallen behind now, but they were also quite strong on pre-LLM NLP for a couple of decades, it was not all fluff.

Yes they have an awful enterprise culture and they are not focused on building excellent products. But what they offer fits the needs of many organizations, and a lot of the things they are doing on R&D are no joke.

replies(4): >>46194436 #>>46194793 #>>46195275 #>>46197699 #
1. tgma ◴[] No.46194793[source]
IBM shouldn't be thought of as a singular company. It is a conglomerate that does widely distinct things. Some enterprise boring profit squeezing, some shady scam "IBM blockchain on Z OS prevents viruses," some research/patent efforts elsewhere.

That said the GP is spot on for this sort of acquisition we know what will happen and has nothing to do with 2nm research division.

replies(2): >>46197031 #>>46197823 #
2. newsoftheday ◴[] No.46197031[source]
> IBM shouldn't be thought of as a singular company. It is a conglomerate that does widely distinct things.

Agreed, like others, small startup I was with, we were acquired years ago and first advice from IBMers who'd been acquired was that IBM is like 1000 smaller companies.

3. kedean ◴[] No.46197823[source]
> IBM shouldn't be thought of as a singular company. It is a conglomerate that does widely distinct things.

This. Employees in the various sub-companies and divisions usually don't even know who most of the executive leadership is outside their little world. There is no cohesive "IBM" anymore, and I don't think there has been for a very long time.