←back to thread

Jujutsu worktrees are convenient (2024)

(shaddy.dev)
128 points nvader | 1 comments | 03 Dec 25 23:26 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jandudulski ◴[08 Dec 25 11:34 UTC] No.46191111[source]▶
`jj workspace add ../project-name-2` vs `git worktree add ../project-name-2`

Sorry, but I don't get the improvement.

replies(2): >>46191158 #>>46191291 #
baq ◴[08 Dec 25 12:04 UTC] No.46191291[source]▶
there isn't any. it's just possible in jj, which does not have feature parity with git and probably doesn't aim to have it anytime soon, if ever (not a contributor, so please don't quote me)
replies(1): >>46194584 #
1. steveklabnik ◴[08 Dec 25 16:52 UTC] No.46194584[source]▶
It depends on what you mean by "feature parity." jj has some features git doesn't, and git has some features jj doesn't. That's likely to be the case into the future, for sure.

There's also like, some features of git aren't features in jj, but that doesn't mean you can't do that stuff with jj, it just works differently. The index or stashes, for example. In a literal sense, that's not parity, but in a logical sense, it is.