(www.youtube.com)

327 points AareyBaba | 1 comments | 07 Dec 25 18:07 UTC | HN request time: 0.266s | source

PDF: https://www.stroustrup.com/JSF-AV-rules.pdf

Show context

barfoure ◴[07 Dec 25 18:29 UTC] No.46183842[source]▶

>>46183657 (OP) #

Do avionics in general subscribe to MISRA C/C++ or do they go even further with an additional (or different) approach?

replies(3): >>46183870 #>>46184021 #>>46184148 #

4gotunameagain ◴[07 Dec 25 18:50 UTC] No.46184021[source]▶

>>46183842 #

Depends on the region. MISRA is widely adopted, and then there are the US MIL standards, ECSS for european aerospace stuff, do-178C for aviation..

replies(2): >>46188605 #>>46194080 #

1. pacoWebConsult ◴[08 Dec 25 16:15 UTC] No.46194080[source]▶

>>46184021 #

DO-178c is not a coding standard, it's a process standard. Projects following DO-178c processes would adopt a coding standard as a part of the process, reviewing software deliverables adhere to those standards.

↑

The C++ standard for the F-35 Fighter Jet [video]