(www.off-policy.com)

106 points drctnlly_crrct | 1 comments | 08 Dec 25 13:23 UTC | HN request time: 0.197s | source

Show context

delichon ◴[08 Dec 25 14:26 UTC] No.46192569[source]▶

>>46191933 (OP) #

> Miss those, and you're not maximally useful. And if it's not maximally useful, it's by definition not AGI.

I know hundreds of natural general intelligences who are not maximally useful, and dozens who are not at all useful. What justifies changing the definition of general intelligence for artificial ones?

replies(4): >>46192735 #>>46193614 #>>46193797 #>>46194679 #

1. jwpapi ◴[08 Dec 25 15:45 UTC] No.46193614[source]▶

>>46192569 #

Yes exactly that sentence led me to step out of the article.

This sentence is wrong in many ways and doesn’t give me trust in OPs opinion nor research abilities.

↑

Alignment is capability