←back to thread

The fuck off contact page

(www.nicchan.me)
484 points OuterVale | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
1. alex_suzuki ◴[] No.46191741[source]
A lot of comments recommend just putting an email on the contact page, which I agree is nice.

Related question: do good, privacy-preserving, cookie-less alternatives to reCAPTCHA exist?

replies(2): >>46191927 #>>46194012 #
2. dicethrowaway1 ◴[] No.46191927[source]
For email, I've had some luck just modifying the page with JS that's either indirect or obfuscated enough that the address can't be pulled directly from it - e.g. "var email" is the address encrypted with a fixed key, the JS decrypts it and then alters the HTML.

It can obviously be bypassed by using a JS runner, but it seems to be enough of a hurdle that few spammers bother. "You don't have to outrun the bear", as it were.

replies(2): >>46192022 #>>46192135 #
3. alex_suzuki ◴[] No.46192022[source]
Nice. It's a pretty low-traffic site, so something that doesn't require an external service but is still capable enough to defeat 90% of spammers sounds like a good compromise. I imagine drawing the email address to a canvas instead of a textual HTML element could be more effective, alas not accessible.
4. foxglacier ◴[] No.46192135[source]
I have my email in plain text on every page of my site. I get about 1 spam per day that I see in my inbox on Gmail. I suppose Gmail filters even more silently. It's been working fine for over a decade. Is there some scale of site popularity where it becomes a problem?
5. Biganon ◴[] No.46194012[source]
> do good, privacy-preserving, cookie-less alternatives to reCAPTCHA exist

I implement a custom proof-of-work algo in JS.

Not very eco-friendly, but then again captchas are not disabled-people-friendly, so pick your poison I guess.