←back to thread

164 points Anon84 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.221s | source
1. conartist6 ◴[] No.46191381[source]
Putting this here for visibility, but go upvote the people who actually did the sleuthwork: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46190013

It seems like the financial outlet made a maths error and then was amazed by the absurdity of the incorrect result they got.

Specifically their whole outrage is based on having accidentally calculated what would need to happen for Palantir's revenues to grow 1500x as opposed to 15x. The corrected statistic would be the Palantir requires 11.4% revenue growth year over year not 35%.