←back to thread

78 points pjmlp | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
kstrauser ◴[] No.46189780[source]
> In the 2000's, politics interfered and browser vendors removed plug-in support, instead preferring their own walled gardens and restricted sandboxes

That's one way to say it. The more common way was that users got tired of crappy plugins crashing their browsers, and browser devs got tired of endless complaints from their users.

It wasn't "politics" of any sort that made browsers sandbox everything. It was the insane number of crashes, out-of-memories, pegged CPUs, and security vulnerabilities that pushed things over the edge. You can only sit through so many dozens of Adobe 0-days before it starts to grate.

replies(8): >>46189829 #>>46189834 #>>46189952 #>>46190045 #>>46190066 #>>46190195 #>>46190485 #>>46198543 #
locallost ◴[] No.46189834[source]
Yeah, a totally mind boggling statement, almost completely void of reality. I wasn't even tired of the crashes, it was just a totally awful experience of using them in every way. They took forever to load, were clunky to use and even just downright ugly because the UI had nothing to do with what you usually got to use, and was a lot worse. The idea was good on paper, but the implementation sucked.

Everyone, well almost everyone apparently, was relieved we didn't have to deal with any of that anymore.

replies(1): >>46189928 #
razakel ◴[] No.46189928[source]
Even Flash wasn't as bad as Java applets, and that's saying something.
replies(1): >>46190186 #
1. wiseowise ◴[] No.46190186{3}[source]
Flash was great when it came to experiences. Ignoring melting CPU, crashes, loading times.