←back to thread

681 points Anon84 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
hvb2 ◴[] No.46189153[source]
> your bank account would just hold USDC or Bitcoin, and you could send a billion dollars to anyone in the world in a few seconds. That belief is powerful and I still ascribe to it.

These statements still surprise me to this day. If you're a good person engineer, why does sending money in seconds need blockchain? There's parts of the world where this is commonplace and free as well.

I don't believe cross border was there in 2010 or so but why not implement that feature in an existing system instead of building out a parallel universe

replies(7): >>46189177 #>>46189180 #>>46189204 #>>46189223 #>>46189733 #>>46189828 #>>46198693 #
yes_man ◴[] No.46189204[source]
The cross border not about technical capacity but legal control. For example if you are a refugee you might not be able to pull your bank savings and liquid stock with you from your home country to another without it being seized or taxed, but your crypto is always yours as long as you are the only holder of the keys. This scenario is one of the rare real world utilities I see with crypto.
replies(3): >>46190054 #>>46190439 #>>46191906 #
1. hvb2 ◴[] No.46190054[source]
Yes, there are rare use cases where this is useful. The high inflation case is one as well.

So stop talking about a parallel system and start talking about what it is, a niche product.