←back to thread

549 points thecr0w | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.235s | source
Show context
handedness ◴[] No.46188347[source]
A site in '96 would have been built largely with tables, not CSS. CSS didn't become a thing until a couple of years later.

I know this because I'm still salty about the transition. For all of CSS's advantages, we lost something when we largely moved away from tables.

replies(2): >>46188426 #>>46188429 #
chrisco255 ◴[] No.46188426[source]
We lost something for a time but flex box and CSS grid (which came more recently) are objectively better than tables.
replies(1): >>46189985 #
1. icommentedtoday ◴[] No.46189985[source]
How are they objectively better? They seem way too complex for me