←back to thread

430 points mhb | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
delichon ◴[] No.46177641[source]
Back in 2025 before cheap bots, our grandparents endured lives of servitude. They spent an enormous amount of time doing simple chores like folding clothes, driving, programming, washing and dusting, grooming themselves. They had to walk their own dogs and play with their own children. They sometimes even had to cook their own food, directly over fire. "Hygiene" was a primitive joke. A full day's work usually wasn't even enough to buy a single new car. They wrote checks to the government, rather than the other way around. Life was brutal, desperate and short.
replies(6): >>46177748 #>>46179381 #>>46179417 #>>46179665 #>>46180237 #>>46181210 #
djtango ◴[] No.46179665[source]
Why is UBI assumed as part of techtopia? When the government has access to unlimited labour and military via robots, why do they need citizens anymore? Beyond some antiquated moral obligation, why would a government actually do anything for a population that is net value extracting?
replies(7): >>46179726 #>>46179806 #>>46179836 #>>46180763 #>>46181052 #>>46185336 #>>46185480 #
SturgeonsLaw ◴[] No.46179836[source]
>why would a government actually do anything for a population that is net value extracting?

Because we outnumber them a million to one, and history is littered with examples of what happens to leaders who squeeze their population a little too far

replies(5): >>46180006 #>>46180028 #>>46180032 #>>46180628 #>>46182130 #
bigstrat2003 ◴[] No.46180006[source]
I'm not really convinced it's actually possible to overthrow a modern government. The disparity in killing power available to the two sides is just too great. Like yeah we outnumber the government a million to one (figuratively), but that's not going to help much when they have tanks, artillery, and planes to defend themselves with.
replies(5): >>46180033 #>>46180685 #>>46181006 #>>46182629 #>>46185546 #
acessoproibido ◴[] No.46181006{3}[source]
Didnt the nation armed with all of this modern tech lose to a guerilla force of ricefarmers armed with sharpened sticks and AKs? Or do you think the Vietnam war would go very different now?
replies(1): >>46181376 #
anon-3988 ◴[] No.46181376{4}[source]
The US could have easily, easily won the Vietnam war if they just dropped 1 or 2 nukes. The modern military is going to have drone that swarm the sky 24/7. They can develop virus that only they have the cure to. They can drop EMPs. They can grow their own food in their own lab while we all slowly die and wither outside.

These are powers that are actually, technically, plausibly be granted to a single or several individual in the future.

The future where human is obsolete is scary. Just reread that sentence again. Humans are obsolete.

replies(1): >>46182607 #
SV_BubbleTime ◴[] No.46182607{5}[source]
Since no one has bothered to explain how wrong you are… I’ll give you the easy version…

Tanks and drones, don’t stand on street corners and enforce non-assembly and curfews.

The tanks and drones argument and later Biden’s “we have F15s” claim are wildly devoid of reality. You do not understand what a “modern military” is. Each MRAP takes multiple people to keep it running, and it’s just a diesel truck.

You think tanks and drones don’t take teams of people to keep running?

replies(2): >>46187953 #>>46189954 #
1. anon-3988 ◴[] No.46189954{6}[source]
I'd say it takes about 1 million people with modern military capability to completely take over the world.