←back to thread

510 points bookofjoe | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
epsteingpt ◴[] No.46187326[source]
While most comments will be negative toward Dollar General, in many areas Dollar General or Family Dollar or Dollar Tree are the only places you can get access and distribution to a wide range of products and brands in areas which are otherwise underserved.

You can dislike it, but they've evolved and expanded in part because they are very good at serving these areas profitably, where other businesses aren't.

People wanting bank branches and grocery stores and brunch spots here clearly have never lived or worked in many of these areas. The reality of theft, low spend, and employees - though not universal - is hard to fathom if you're not trying to 'run' the business. Good will does not pay your suppliers or rent.

replies(2): >>46187389 #>>46187412 #
garbagewoman ◴[] No.46187389[source]
Did you ever consider that they might have caused this situation?
replies(1): >>46187426 #
qeternity ◴[] No.46187426[source]
It would help people to consider your point if you made even a modest attempt to explain and justify what you mean.
replies(2): >>46188066 #>>46188582 #
garbagewoman ◴[] No.46188066[source]
My point is not to explain how they caused it, its to point out that the commenter didn’t even mention the existence of that possibility
replies(1): >>46189166 #
1. epsteingpt ◴[] No.46189166[source]
It's possible, just unlikely.

The reality is a small business owner does not have the time or wherewithal to negotiate large contracts across hundreds or thousands of brands. They may nail SKU's and quantities better than a Wal-Mart or Dollar General, but at the price of higher costs and lower selection.

You don't really see large scale backlash in communities against these stores for this reason - buying branded at a reasonable price point is foundational for a good quality of life in modern society.

Most people vote with their feet, and are happy with the tradeoff.