←back to thread

549 points thecr0w | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
wilsmex ◴[] No.46186253[source]
Well this was interesting. As someone who was actually building similar website in the late 90's I threw this into the Opus 4.5. Note the original author is wrong about the original site however:

"The Space Jam website is simple: a single HTML page, absolute positioning for every element, and a tiling starfield GIF background.".

This is not true, the site is built using tables, not positioning at all, CSS wasn't a thing back then...

Here was its one-shot attempt at building the same type of layout (table based) with a screenshot and assets as input: https://i.imgur.com/fhdOLwP.png

replies(5): >>46186378 #>>46186513 #>>46186562 #>>46189115 #>>46191298 #
manbash ◴[] No.46186378[source]
Ah, those days, where you would slice your designs and export them to tables.
replies(8): >>46186582 #>>46186584 #>>46186644 #>>46187863 #>>46188038 #>>46189236 #>>46193554 #>>46198144 #
mmanfrin ◴[] No.46188038[source]
I yearn for those days. CSS was a mistake. Tables and DHTML is all one needs.
replies(2): >>46188380 #>>46189427 #
bluSCALE4 ◴[] No.46188380[source]
CSS was a mistake? JavaScript was a mistake, specifically JavaScript frameworks.
replies(1): >>46188415 #
tobyjsullivan ◴[] No.46188415[source]
JavaScript? HTML and HTTP were the real mistakes.
replies(1): >>46188596 #
someguyiguess ◴[] No.46188596[source]
HTML and HTTP? TCP was the real mistake.
replies(1): >>46188823 #
1. insaider ◴[] No.46188823[source]
"In the beginning the universe was created. This made a lot of people angry and has widely been considered as a bad move."