←back to thread

148 points methuselah_in | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
hn_throwaway_99 ◴[] No.46183561[source]
Insofar as this article is about the 4 execs leaving Apple, this is a total non-story and the "What the heck is going on at Apple" is just click bait:

- Lisa Jackson, Apple’s vice president of environment, policy and social initiatives, and general counsel Kate Adams, are set to retire. While these may be high level execs, they don't really have much to do with the overall direction and success of the company. And given the change in the political environment you've seen tons of changes in roles like these at many companies in the past 11 months.

- Alan Dye, vice president of human interface design, is leaving to join Meta as its chief design officer. Sounds like he won't really be missed: https://9to5mac.com/2025/12/04/gruber-apple-employees-giddy-.... Assuming he was responsible for Liquid Glass, I say good riddance.

- John Giannandrea, senior vice president of machine learning and AI strategy, is also retiring. He had basically already been demoted, taken off leading Siri due to Siri's competitive failures.

So yeah, it's pretty obvious that Apple is behind the AI wave, but honestly, they may end up having the last laugh given how much backlash there is from consumers about trying to shoehorn AI into all these places where it's just an annoyance.

replies(3): >>46183642 #>>46187559 #>>46187835 #
ytch ◴[] No.46187835[source]
- vice president of human interface design

- senior vice president of machine learning and AI strategy

If so many people hates/complains on liquid glass and Apple Intelligence, I guess the resign will be a good thing.

replies(1): >>46187949 #
bdangubic ◴[] No.46187949[source]
“many people” are mostly stupid (go to your local dmv to see “many people”) so that it irrelevant. sales are through the roof, profits same, cash on hand to buy many countries, life is good…
replies(1): >>46188291 #
dboreham ◴[] No.46188291[source]
To be fair there are reasons to expect a sample of people from the DMV to be significantly less stupid than the population average.
replies(1): >>46188591 #
1. tomalbrc ◴[] No.46188591{3}[source]
You are responding to someone who thinks password protected PDFs through emails are secure
replies(1): >>46191941 #
2. bdangubic ◴[] No.46191941[source]
:) for mom&pop docs it is top-notch opsec