←back to thread

510 points bookofjoe | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
JSR_FDED ◴[] No.46182225[source]
23% of items are rung up at a higher amount at the register than what it says on the shelf, yet North Carolina law caps penalties at $5,000 per inspection, offering retailers little incentive to fix the problem.

In other words, regulatory capture at its finest, over the backs of the poorest in the country.

replies(11): >>46182488 #>>46182865 #>>46182983 #>>46183366 #>>46184708 #>>46184835 #>>46185258 #>>46185665 #>>46186170 #>>46186279 #>>46191809 #
fencepost ◴[] No.46186170[source]
Depending on how much independence the inspectors have they could probably turn a heck of a profit per inspector (thus being able to argue their continued existence to the legislature).

Could an inspector manage two per day? If you figure the full cost of each inspector is $150,000/year but dedicated ones could do 8 inspections at $5k each per week, there's well over $1 million/year per inspector (assuming not all inspections would be the full fine, there's travel costs per inspector, inspectors would have to spend some office/court time, etc. that would bring it down from the potential maximum of ~$1,800,000 each factoring in vacation and holidays).

Even Republicans could get behind it! "We're reducing the direct budget of the department, but authorizing it to hire additional inspectors in order to bring in additional revenue that can be utilized to bring the budget to or above its current levels." It's a cost reduction measure!

replies(2): >>46188318 #>>46189963 #
1. thfuran ◴[] No.46188318[source]
>Even Republicans could get behind it!

No, they have no actual interest in saving the government money, especially if it comes at the cost of enforcing regulations on corporations.