←back to thread

I failed to recreate the 1996 Space Jam website with Claude

(j0nah.com)
549 points thecr0w | 1 comments | 07 Dec 25 17:18 UTC | HN request time: 0.191s | source
Show context
999900000999 ◴[07 Dec 25 18:05 UTC] No.46183645[source]▶
Space Jam website design as an LLM benchmark.

This article is a bit negative. Claude gets close , it just can't get the order right which is something OP can manually fix.

I prefer GitHub Copilot because it's cheaper and integrates with GitHub directly. I'll have times where it'll get it right, and times when I have to try 3 or 4 times.

replies(4): >>46183660 #>>46183768 #>>46184119 #>>46184297 #
bigstrat2003 ◴[07 Dec 25 19:25 UTC] No.46184297[source]▶
> it just can't get the order right which is something OP can manually fix.

If the tool needs you to check up on it and fix its work, it's a bad tool.

replies(4): >>46184341 #>>46184562 #>>46184805 #>>46186273 #
1. mrweasel ◴[07 Dec 25 20:24 UTC] No.46184805[source]▶
That's my thinking. If I need to check up on the work, then I'm equally capable of writing the code myself. It might go faster with an LLM assisting me, and that feels perfectly fine. My issue is when people use the AI tools to generate something far beyond their own capabilities. In those cases, who checks the result?