←back to thread

504 points puttycat | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.339s | source
Show context
Ekaros ◴[] No.46182662[source]
One wonders why this has not been largely fully automated. If we track those citations anyway. Surely we have database of them and most of them are easily matched there. So only outliers need to be checked either as new latest papers or mistakes which should be close enough to something or real fakes.

Maybe there just is no incentive for this type of activity.

replies(3): >>46182708 #>>46182710 #>>46184342 #
1. IanCal ◴[] No.46184342[source]
We do have these things and they are often wrong. Loads of the examples given look better than things I’ve seen in real databases on this kind of thing and I worked in this area for a decade.