←back to thread

504 points puttycat | 1 comments | | HN request time: 3.065s | source
Show context
TaupeRanger ◴[] No.46182062[source]
It's going to be even worse than 50:

> Given that we've only scanned 300 out of 20,000 submissions, we estimate that we will find 100s of hallucinated papers in the coming days.

replies(1): >>46182080 #
shusaku ◴[] No.46182080[source]
20,000 submissions to a single conference? That is nuts
replies(3): >>46182151 #>>46182203 #>>46182579 #
zipy124 ◴[] No.46182579[source]
When academics are graded based on number of papers this is the result.
replies(1): >>46183230 #
adestefan ◴[] No.46183230[source]
The problem isn't only papers it's that the world of academic computer science coalesced around conference submissions instead of journal submissions. This isn't new and was an issue 30 years ago when I was in grad school. It makes the work of conference organizes the little block holding up the entire system.
replies(1): >>46183839 #
1. DonaldPShimoda ◴[] No.46183839[source]
Makes me grateful I'm in an area of CS where the "big" conferences are like 500 attendees.