←back to thread

597 points doener | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.19s | source
Show context
erikerikson ◴[] No.46182628[source]
That was by far the most hostile cookie banner I've ever seen by a lot. It required multiple levels of saying no with a bid level of clicking reject a few hundred times. It wasn't worth it.
replies(1): >>46182733 #
cube00 ◴[] No.46182733[source]
Unless you pay for the subscription you can't reject all of it anyway.

* Data processing by advertising providers including personalised advertising with profiling - Consent required for free use

The full page reload after wasting all that time to realise I don't actually have a choice was a nice touch.

replies(2): >>46183355 #>>46183791 #
1. lucb1e ◴[] No.46183791[source]
Note that this is considered not freely given consent by various data protection authorities, including the Dutch one (quite strongly; could find a source but would be in Dutch) and the European-wide collective of them (more weakly): https://www.edpb.europa.eu/news/news/2024/edpb-consent-or-pa... It's not like GDPR is new or dubiously worded on this aspect. They're willfully ignoring both ethical boundaries and the law

I don't know why people keep sending me / sharing Heise links. There's more than one news website in the world