←back to thread

510 points bookofjoe | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.364s | source
Show context
JSR_FDED ◴[] No.46182225[source]
23% of items are rung up at a higher amount at the register than what it says on the shelf, yet North Carolina law caps penalties at $5,000 per inspection, offering retailers little incentive to fix the problem.

In other words, regulatory capture at its finest, over the backs of the poorest in the country.

replies(11): >>46182488 #>>46182865 #>>46182983 #>>46183366 #>>46184708 #>>46184835 #>>46185258 #>>46185665 #>>46186170 #>>46186279 #>>46191809 #
gessha ◴[] No.46182983[source]
What this calls for is an Amazon-style optimization of inspections. Given X inspectors and Y locations, what is the most optimal routing to optimize for coverage and penalty collection?
replies(3): >>46183043 #>>46183404 #>>46184790 #
1. burnt-resistor ◴[] No.46183404[source]
Offtopic, but I made the mistake once of buying groceries from Amazon and they instead sold me a package of cheddar cheese that was completely blue from mold. Some "quality" inspections they got going don't bode well for public-private "partnerships" that outsource essential government functions to a corrupt third-party that's likely to be owned by a craptastic private equity hedge fund.
replies(1): >>46184981 #
2. adamsb6 ◴[] No.46184981[source]
The error rate is nonzero, but in my experience Amazon will make it right with little friction. A short chat is almost always enough, no labyrinthine phone trees or escalations.
replies(2): >>46186396 #>>46186551 #
3. rootusrootus ◴[] No.46186396[source]
Last time I had to contact Amazon the chat option was no longer anywhere to be found. I gave up and actually called. They were nice enough on the phone but it was a good reminder of how much Amazon’s customer service has degraded.
4. PopePompus ◴[] No.46186551[source]
Yes, but all problems with tainted food are not as visually obvious as mold. After some bad surprises, I've decided to never eat anything I ordered from Amazon.