←back to thread

Over fifty new hallucinations in ICLR 2026 submissions

(gptzero.me)
504 points puttycat | 3 comments | 07 Dec 25 13:16 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
theoldgreybeard ◴[07 Dec 25 15:09 UTC] No.46182214[source]▶
If a carpenter builds a crappy shelf “because” his power tools are not calibrated correctly - that’s a crappy carpenter, not a crappy tool.

If a scientist uses an LLM to write a paper with fabricated citations - that’s a crappy scientist.

AI is not the problem, laziness and negligence is. There needs to be serious social consequences to this kind of thing, otherwise we are tacitly endorsing it.

replies(37): >>46182289 #>>46182330 #>>46182334 #>>46182385 #>>46182388 #>>46182401 #>>46182463 #>>46182527 #>>46182613 #>>46182714 #>>46182766 #>>46182839 #>>46182944 #>>46183118 #>>46183119 #>>46183265 #>>46183341 #>>46183343 #>>46183387 #>>46183435 #>>46183436 #>>46183490 #>>46183571 #>>46183613 #>>46183846 #>>46183911 #>>46183917 #>>46183923 #>>46183940 #>>46184450 #>>46184551 #>>46184653 #>>46184796 #>>46185025 #>>46185817 #>>46185849 #>>46189343 #
Forgeties79 ◴[07 Dec 25 15:44 UTC] No.46182527[source]▶
If my calculator gives me the wrong number 20% of the time yeah I should’ve identified the problem, but ideally, that wouldn’t have been sold to me as a functioning calculator in the first place.
replies(2): >>46182711 #>>46182712 #
theoldgreybeard ◴[07 Dec 25 16:08 UTC] No.46182712[source]▶
If it was a well understood property of calculators that they gave incorrect answers randomly then you need to adjust the way you use the tool accordingly.
replies(4): >>46182893 #>>46183352 #>>46183528 #>>46187937 #
1. bigstrat2003 ◴[07 Dec 25 17:27 UTC] No.46183352{3}[source]▶
Uh yeah... I would not use that tool. A tool which doesn't do its job randomly is useless.
replies(1): >>46184713 #
2. amrocha ◴[07 Dec 25 20:13 UTC] No.46184713[source]▶
Sorry, Utkar the manager will fire you if you don’t use his shitty calculator. If you take the time to check the output every time you’ll be fired for being too slow. Better pray the calculator doesn’t lie to you.
replies(1): >>46218021 #
3. Forgeties79 ◴[10 Dec 25 14:23 UTC] No.46218021[source]▶
I’m not sure I understand the Utkar reference