←back to thread

Perl's decline was cultural

(www.beatworm.co.uk)
393 points todsacerdoti | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.537s | source
Show context
jordanb ◴[] No.46175337[source]
I always found the Perl "community" to be really off-putting with all the monk and wizard nonsense. Then there was the whole one-liner thing that was all about being clever and obscure. Everything about Python came off as being much more serious and normal for a young nerd who wasn't a theater kid.
replies(21): >>46175493 #>>46175513 #>>46175630 #>>46175714 #>>46175715 #>>46175932 #>>46176421 #>>46176502 #>>46176561 #>>46176760 #>>46176895 #>>46177183 #>>46177249 #>>46177277 #>>46178169 #>>46179976 #>>46180300 #>>46180433 #>>46180626 #>>46182489 #>>46197026 #
pavel_lishin ◴[] No.46175630[source]
I'm having to pick up some perl now, and while I don't interact with the community, it surely _feels_ like it was written by wizards, for wizards. Obscure, non-intuitive oneliners, syntax that feels like it was intentionally written to be complicated, and a few other things that feel impossible to understand without reading the docs. (Before everyone jumps on me - yes, as a developer, I should be able to read documentation. And I did. But until I did so, what the code was doing was completely opaque to me. That feels like bad language design.)

Some of it I recognize as being an artefact of the time, when conciseness really mattered. But it's still obnoxious in 2025.

The whole thing reminds me of D&D, which is full of classes & spells that only exist in modern D&D because of One Guy who happened to be at the table with Gygax, who really wanted to be a wuxia guy he saw in a movie, or because he really wanted a spell to be applicable for that one night at the table, and now it's hard-coded into the game.

replies(10): >>46175952 #>>46175994 #>>46176043 #>>46176170 #>>46176215 #>>46179499 #>>46180661 #>>46180866 #>>46184592 #>>46208093 #
phil21 ◴[] No.46175952[source]
It’s interesting to me how brains work.

Perl has always “flowed” for me and made mostly intuitive sense. Every other language I’ve had to hack on to get something done is a struggle for me to fit into some rigid-feeling mental box.

I understand I’m the weird one, but man I miss Perl being an acceptable language to pound out a quick program in between “bash script” and “real developer”.

replies(6): >>46176326 #>>46179351 #>>46180790 #>>46181485 #>>46182182 #>>46183310 #
1. tootie ◴[] No.46183310[source]
I wrote a ton of Perl 5 and also found it very intuitive and powerful. I think the notion that Python is "more readable" is true, but also less useful of a metric than it would seem. Python is still gibberish to a new coder and requires training and experience to master. Perl requires somewhat more effort to acclimate to, but ultimately is much more expressive and much closer to real-world software engineering problems. Once the incremental effort is made, Perl is (or at least was) a better Python.
replies(1): >>46183939 #
2. jgalt212 ◴[] No.46183939[source]
For me it's not so much that Python was more "readable" than Perl. I've found pretty much any language other than XSLT more readable than Perl.