←back to thread

126 points petermcneeley | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
KellyCriterion ◴[] No.46179887[source]
Germanys problem is mainly not the number of recruits: The didnt invest for decades, so structures in the background to handle all those additional young recruits are no more existing. Even if they would draw just 25% of evey year, they would not be able to manage it.
replies(1): >>46180469 #
sunshine-o ◴[] No.46180469[source]
> The didnt invest for decades, so structures in the background to handle all those additional young recruits are no more existing.

Yes but remember that was the point.

The career and trained militaries were spending most of their time schooling young people and were not focusing on capabilities. This is why most countries put an end on that nonsense.

So right now you can be sure an enormous amount of personnel in the German army switched focused on running this new "Voluntary service". A voluntary service which will produce at best 1% of workable soldiers.

This makes no sense.

replies(1): >>46182535 #
1. KellyCriterion ◴[] No.46182535[source]
Clearly this country would have enough ressources to have a "professional army" like in many other countries; there are really enough peoply willingly "taking some action", also highly motivatd people would make a much better/stronger force than volounteers?