←back to thread

504 points puttycat | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jameshart ◴[] No.46182056[source]
Is the baseline assumption of this work that an erroneous citation is LLM hallucinated?

Did they run the checker across a body of papers before LLMs were available and verify that there were no citations in peer reviewed papers that got authors or titles wrong?

replies(5): >>46182229 #>>46182238 #>>46182245 #>>46182375 #>>46186305 #
1. tokai ◴[] No.46182229[source]
Yeah that is what their tool does.