←back to thread

597 points doener | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.322s | source
Show context
GnarfGnarf ◴[] No.46181666[source]
I'm a Windows/macOS developer, but I strongly feel that all national governments need to convert to Linux, for strategic sovereignty. I'm sure Microsoft, under orders from the U.S. government, could disable all computers in any country or organization, at the flick of a switch.

Imagine how Open Source Software could improve if a consortium of nations put their money and resources into commissioning bug fixes and enhancements, which would be of collective benefit.

Apart from a few niche cases, the needs of most government bureaucracies would be well served by currently available OSS word processing, spreadsheet, presentation and graphics software.

replies(13): >>46181734 #>>46181848 #>>46181909 #>>46181927 #>>46181997 #>>46182103 #>>46182235 #>>46182308 #>>46182425 #>>46183228 #>>46184253 #>>46189067 #>>46203643 #
al_borland ◴[] No.46181909[source]
Today when a government pushes for a backdoor we often see companies push back. The FBI publicly complained about iMessage encryption a lot, and currently Apple is also telling the government of India they aren’t going to install their “security” software… those are just a couple examples.

What happens when major OSS projects are controlled by the governments themselves? Will David still beat Goliath?

replies(4): >>46181928 #>>46182116 #>>46182117 #>>46182884 #
1. Spooky23 ◴[] No.46182116[source]
Maybe. I highly doubt Apple or any other company isn’t complying in some way.

It’s been widely speculated that there are gentleman’s agreements where strategic bugs do not get fixed. To apple’s credit, unlike say BlackBerry, they designed iMessage where many of the intercept methods are tamper evident.