←back to thread

62 points grouchy | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bccdee ◴[] No.46178688[source]
> Users get personalized interfaces without custom code.

Personalized interfaces are bad. I don't want to configure anything, and I don't want anything automatically configured on my behalf. I want it to just work; that kind of design takes effort & there's no way around it.

Your UI should be clear and predictable. A chatbot should not be moving around the buttons. If I'm going to compare notes with my friend on how to use your software, all the buttons need to be in the same place. People hate UI redesigns for a reason: Once they've learned how to use your software, they don't want to re-learn. A product that constantly redesigns itself at the whims of an inscrutable chatbot which thinks it knows what you want is the worst of all possible products.

ALSO: Egregiously written article. I assume it's made by an LLM.

replies(8): >>46178863 #>>46179118 #>>46179820 #>>46180211 #>>46180547 #>>46181428 #>>46181458 #>>46183968 #
1. jayd16 ◴[] No.46179820[source]
Ehhhh....

Is an AI driven feed not UI changes? Those are incredibly successful but the buttons change every refresh.

UIs do not need to be static. The key is that there is a coherent pattern to what's changing.

When you look at it through that lens it doesn't seem so exotic.

replies(1): >>46181447 #
2. mx7zysuj4xew ◴[] No.46181447[source]
UIs definitely need to be static as people eventually build muscle memory