←back to thread

430 points mhb | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
venturecruelty ◴[] No.46177867[source]
No, the past was not "cute", but it also wasn't entirely a Dickensian disaster, either. There are parts about the past we can miss: shared public spaces, authenticity, quality goods and services, ritual, deeper connectedness to each other. Why does it have to be this dichotomy? Why can't we have both now? In fact, we ought to have both. It's not like it's impossible. We just have to user the power we have to build that world. It won't be easy, but it isn't a choice between "Little House on the Prairie" and "Bladerunner".
replies(7): >>46178794 #>>46178910 #>>46179209 #>>46179722 #>>46179760 #>>46181459 #>>46185673 #
1. UltraSane ◴[] No.46179722[source]
Life for the very richest people hundreds of years ago might have been almost as comfortable as the average person today but for the vast majority of people it was truly miserable.