←back to thread

Trains cancelled over fake bridge collapse image

(www.bbc.com)
263 points josephcsible | 1 comments | 07 Dec 25 00:37 UTC | HN request time: 0.221s | source
Show context
crazygringo ◴[07 Dec 25 02:01 UTC] No.46178534[source]▶
To be clear, you don't need AI for this.

You can also just call the railroad and report the bridge as damaged.

Hoaxes and pranks and fake threats have been around forever.

replies(5): >>46178555 #>>46178636 #>>46178664 #>>46180242 #>>46180407 #
mschuster91 ◴[07 Dec 25 02:06 UTC] No.46178555[source]▶
That leaves much more of a paper trail. People routinely are fined and jailed for pulling off such "pranks", partially because "fake threats"/"abuse of emergency response resources" are an exception to many freedom-of-speech laws.

A fake photo of a collapsed bridge however won't cross that criminal threshold.

replies(1): >>46179497 #
SoftTalker ◴[07 Dec 25 05:58 UTC] No.46179497[source]▶
If you create a fake photo/video with intent to cause disruption it absolutely crosses the threshold.
replies(3): >>46179709 #>>46179720 #>>46180942 #
1. euroderf ◴[07 Dec 25 06:45 UTC] No.46179709[source]▶
Intent is a valid legal concept. Certainly there's no way to try "swatting" without crossing that line of intent, but (for example) less-threatening prank phone calls can be in the grey area.

I presume there is established legal practice for handling these kinds of things, but for generative images the legal limits won't achieve wide awareness until some teenagers and assorted morons get hauled into court.