←back to thread

263 points josephcsible | 2 comments | | HN request time: 3.803s | source
Show context
osigurdson ◴[] No.46178878[source]
From 1950 - 2005(ish) there were a small number of sources due to the enormous moat required to become a broadcaster. From 2005 to 2021, you could mostly trust video as the costs of casual fakery were prohibitive. Now that the cost to produce fake videos are near zero, I suspect we will return to a much smaller number of sources (though not as small as in the pre YouTube era).
replies(3): >>46179008 #>>46179539 #>>46179662 #
1. BobbyTables2 ◴[] No.46179662[source]
Some of the “smaller sources” also distorted facts.

We might even have fewer than before - between Internet commentators and loss of confidence from AI, real journalism may not be as highly valued as it was before the Internet…

replies(1): >>46183650 #
2. osigurdson ◴[] No.46183650[source]
It will entirely be about trust. I don't think fakery is worth it for any company with > $1B market cap as trust is such a valuable commodity. It isn't like we are just going to have a single state broadcaster or something like that (at least, I hope not). However it is going to favour larger / more established sources which is unfortunate as well.