←back to thread

263 points josephcsible | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
crazygringo ◴[] No.46178534[source]
To be clear, you don't need AI for this.

You can also just call the railroad and report the bridge as damaged.

Hoaxes and pranks and fake threats have been around forever.

replies(5): >>46178555 #>>46178636 #>>46178664 #>>46180242 #>>46180407 #
ares623 ◴[] No.46178636[source]
Again, I see this argument.

“Bad X has happened before and unsolved. Why worry about bad X^2?”

Personally I’d prefer if it remained at X so solutions can catch up. But that’s just me.

replies(2): >>46178698 #>>46178913 #
1. xandrius ◴[] No.46178913[source]
Yep, why give people computers? It just increases the number of bad X, before writing these type of hoaxes were much less common.
replies(1): >>46179494 #
2. theendisney ◴[] No.46179494[source]
I see room for a platform that only does auth, reviews and perhaps indexing.

Since you didnt ask, let me needlessly elaborate.

You can have YouTube or X or Facebook "design" a web page for you but those are always extremely lame. Just have websites in stead?? Their moderation looks more like a zombie shooter. Wikipedia has some kind of internet trial but that is so unsophisticated that it might even be worse.

It could be a simple redaction with a number of seats that can be emptied when the users request it though a random selection of jurors.

The redaction makes suggestions and eventually removes your website.

The site can still be publicly available before and after, it just doesnt live in the index.