←back to thread

263 points josephcsible | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.215s | source
Show context
mr_windfrog ◴[] No.46178827[source]
What this incident really shows is the growing gap between how easy it is to create a convincing warning and how costly it is to verify what's actually happening. Hoaxes aren't new, but generative tools make fabrication almost free and massively increase the volume.

The rail operator didn't do anything wrong. After an earthquake and a realistic-looking image, the only responsible action is to treat it as potentially real and inspect the track.

This wasn't catastrophic, but it's a preview of a world where a single person can cheaply trigger high-cost responses. The systems we build will have to adapt, not by ignoring social media reports, but by developing faster, more resilient ways to distinguish signal from noise.

replies(9): >>46178848 #>>46178936 #>>46179699 #>>46180135 #>>46180154 #>>46180642 #>>46180686 #>>46181129 #>>46185243 #
bncndn0956 ◴[] No.46178848[source]
Sir, this is AI prose. Wendy's doesn't allow AI prose.
replies(1): >>46178900 #
1. mr_windfrog ◴[] No.46178900[source]
Thanks for the heads-up! I actually wrote this based on my own thoughts about the incident, but I understand the concern. I'll make sure to keep my posts in line with the community guidelines.