←back to thread

263 points josephcsible | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.31s | source
Show context
crazygringo ◴[] No.46178534[source]
To be clear, you don't need AI for this.

You can also just call the railroad and report the bridge as damaged.

Hoaxes and pranks and fake threats have been around forever.

replies(5): >>46178555 #>>46178636 #>>46178664 #>>46180242 #>>46180407 #
add-sub-mul-div ◴[] No.46178664[source]
You also don't need gunpowder to kill someone with projectiles, but gunpowder changed things in important ways. All I ever see are the most specious knee-jerk defenses of AI that immediately fall apart.
replies(2): >>46178821 #>>46180478 #
1. Ukv ◴[] No.46178821[source]
It's not clear to me that it "changed things in important ways" in this case if a call alleging serious damage to the rail would've similarly triggered a pause for inspection.
replies(2): >>46178842 #>>46180176 #
2. defrost ◴[] No.46178842[source]
A phone call to railway management claiming stone fall on a track, a dead cow, a stalled car, etc will trigger a slowdown on that line, a call to the driver, and an inspection.

If that's not happening then management is playing fast and loose with legal responsibility and the risks of mass and inertia.

3. j_maffe ◴[] No.46180176[source]
It's not about the possibility, it's about probability. People are posting more fake images and videos than ever before. More is categorically different.