←back to thread

396 points doener | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.6s | source
Show context
vunderba ◴[] No.46175068[source]
I've done some preliminary testing with Z-Image Turbo in the past week.

Thoughts

- It's fast (~3 seconds on my RTX 4090)

- Surprisingly capable of maintaining image integrity even at high resolutions (1536x1024, sometimes 2048x2048)

- The adherence is impressive for a 6B parameter model

Some tests (2 / 4 passed):

https://imgpb.com/exMoQ

Personally I find it works better as a refiner model downstream of Qwen-Image 20b which has significantly better prompt understanding but has an unnatural "smoothness" to its generated images.

replies(6): >>46175104 #>>46175331 #>>46177028 #>>46177043 #>>46177543 #>>46178707 #
soontimes ◴[] No.46177543[source]
If that’s your website please check GitHub link - it has a typo (gitub) and goes to a malicious site
replies(2): >>46177568 #>>46177584 #
1. vunderba ◴[] No.46177584[source]
Thanks for the heads up. I just checked the site through several browsers and proxying through a VPN. There's no typo and it properly links to:

https://github.com/Tongyi-MAI/Z-Image

Screenshot of site with network tools open to indicate link

https://imgur.com/a/FZDz0K2

EDIT: It's possible that this issue might have existed in an old cached version. I'll purge the cache just to make sure.

replies(1): >>46177640 #
2. rprwhite ◴[] No.46177640[source]
The link with the typo is in the footer.
replies(1): >>46177659 #
3. vunderba ◴[] No.46177659[source]
Well holy crap - that's been there for about forever! I need a "domain name" spellchecker built into my Gulp CI/CD flow.

EDIT: Fixed! Thanks soontimes and rprwhite!