←back to thread

396 points doener | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
vunderba ◴[] No.46175068[source]
I've done some preliminary testing with Z-Image Turbo in the past week.

Thoughts

- It's fast (~3 seconds on my RTX 4090)

- Surprisingly capable of maintaining image integrity even at high resolutions (1536x1024, sometimes 2048x2048)

- The adherence is impressive for a 6B parameter model

Some tests (2 / 4 passed):

https://imgpb.com/exMoQ

Personally I find it works better as a refiner model downstream of Qwen-Image 20b which has significantly better prompt understanding but has an unnatural "smoothness" to its generated images.

replies(6): >>46175104 #>>46175331 #>>46177028 #>>46177043 #>>46177543 #>>46178707 #
amrrs ◴[] No.46175331[source]
On fal, it takes less than a second many times.

https://fal.ai/models/fal-ai/z-image/turbo/api

Couple that with the LoRA, in about 3 seconds you can generate completely personalized images.

The speed alone is a big factor but if you put the model side by side with seedream and nanobanana and other models it's definitely in the top 5 and that's killer combo imho.

replies(1): >>46177047 #
1. venusenvy47 ◴[] No.46177047[source]
I don't know anything about paying for these services, and as a beginner, I worry about running up a huge bill. Do they let you set a limit on how much you pay? I see their pricing examples, but I've never tried one of these.

https://fal.ai/pricing

replies(2): >>46177422 #>>46179998 #
2. tethys ◴[] No.46177422[source]
It works with prepaid credits, so there should be no risk. Minimum credit amount is $10, though.
replies(1): >>46177695 #
3. vunderba ◴[] No.46177695[source]
This. You can also run most (if not all) of the models that Fal.ai directly from the playground tab including Z-Image Turbo.

https://fal.ai/models/fal-ai/z-image/turbo

4. Bombthecat ◴[] No.46179998[source]
For images I like them: https://runware.ai/ super cheap and super fast, they also support Loras and you can upload your own models.

And you work with credits

replies(1): >>46183028 #
5. Bombthecat ◴[] No.46183028[source]
Why the down vote? Are they scam?