←back to thread

241 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.301s | source
Show context
kachapopopow ◴[] No.46094337[source]
I just can't get over how ridicioulus the "no ai" statement is.

I really love the part where llm.txt has the same notice, something humans will never read, or the fact that llm.txt exists considering that there is distaste for AI in every part of this llm generated book.

replies(2): >>46094824 #>>46094996 #
booleandilemma ◴[] No.46094824[source]
"Not generated by AI" is something that every programmer everywhere is going to say about their own work, even when it's obviously AI generated. I've started to publicly call people out when I see they've posted something on social media (LinkedIn, etc.) when I see they've made an AI-generated post. The fraud has to stop.
replies(3): >>46094940 #>>46094959 #>>46095084 #
1. lillecarl ◴[] No.46094940[source]
There's also the option of embracing it.

https://github.com/Lillecarl/lix/commit/9ac72bbd0c7802ca83a9...

I'm not ashamed to use AI if it improves my output, people draw the line of "acceptable use" differently just like drug addicts talk shit about each other's drugs to justify their own. I think honesty is more important than cleanliness.