←back to thread

218 points NullHypothesist | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
arjie ◴[] No.46010639[source]
The effectiveness with which AVs have been able to test and spread despite local municipalities being fairly luddite about them does provide positive evidence for the idea that states are the right level of government for many of these decisions. If this had been entirely up to Bay Area municipalities it would have been infeasible, and this outcome and the lives consequently saved will be due to state-level decision-makers being able to make better decisions than local municipal decision-makers.

If the urban sprawl of the Bay Area were (correctly, in my opinion) represented as a single fused city-county like Tokyo, I think we would have better governance, but highly fragmented municipalities means we have a lot of free-rider vetos.

replies(2): >>46010691 #>>46010804 #
BurningFrog ◴[] No.46010691[source]
Maybe. It would still not be governed by Japanese politicians...
replies(2): >>46010799 #>>46011294 #
piva00 ◴[] No.46010799[source]
Also, if state government was Tokyo-level of public service then CA would have had decent public transportation a very long time ago, eradicating a huge part of the value proposal of Waymo.
replies(2): >>46010982 #>>46011282 #
1. gretch ◴[] No.46011282[source]
Maybe, but Tokyo, despite being literally tokyo with tokyo's politicians and tokyo's transit system has allowed Waymo to come in: https://waymo.com/waymo-in-japan/

So I guess it's still pretty valuable