←back to thread

100 points polalavik | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
BadBadJellyBean ◴[] No.46009959[source]
I find it interesting that the question is "why don't they use drones". My question is: why so much air surveillance? I live in Germany. The only times I hear a helicopter is if someone is being rescued or if someones missing. I rarely see them at all.
replies(8): >>46009992 #>>46010039 #>>46010046 #>>46010095 #>>46010377 #>>46010416 #>>46010471 #>>46010969 #
shoddydoordesk ◴[] No.46009992[source]
There are high speed police chases (100mph+) in Los Angeles — no exaggeration — on an almost daily basis. Air support is the primary defense tool for law enforcement.

It's so bad that the local TV stations have their own choppers and a dedicated on-screen UI tailored for the chases with GPS-based tracking and speed.

If you're lucky you can catch one of the many YouTube live streams. Here's one from....two days ago: https://www.youtube.com/live/uGiJU-FlpdE

replies(7): >>46010007 #>>46010024 #>>46010029 #>>46010186 #>>46010216 #>>46010236 #>>46010463 #
asdff ◴[] No.46010024[source]
They get away from time to time from the airship. Two in one week this past august and I don't think they ever caught the suspects. One drove under an overpass and fled on foot, the other entered LAX airspace which requires waiting on clearance from ATC and got away somehow after that. I don't know why they don't just shoot a magnetic dart at the car with a gps tracker on it.
replies(3): >>46010063 #>>46010120 #>>46011108 #
Aurornis ◴[] No.46010120[source]
> I don't know why they don't just shoot a magnetic dart at the car with a gps tracker on it.

Hitting a car going 100mph with a magnetic dart that and getting it to hit on a metal part, not a window or trim, and specially a steel panel, is not easy at all.

replies(3): >>46010248 #>>46010268 #>>46010702 #
mapt ◴[] No.46010248[source]
There's a lot more aluminum than steel on car exteriors these days.
replies(1): >>46010334 #
hollerith ◴[] No.46010334{3}[source]
This got me curious so I went out on the street and held a magnet to the front passenger door of the first 6 parked cars I came across. The magnet stuck to 4 of them. The ones it did not stick to are a Nissan Rogue and a Jeep Sahara 4xe.
replies(1): >>46010426 #
brian-armstrong ◴[] No.46010426{4}[source]
Decided to scratch up some peoples' clear coats for a little science experiment?
replies(2): >>46010774 #>>46010892 #
hollerith ◴[] No.46010774{5}[source]
Could I have damaged the cars even though I saw no signs of damage?

It would be nice if someone else with knowledge would chime in here. If this damages cars, then I want to know, so I can stop doing it in the future.

replies(2): >>46010820 #>>46011123 #
1. bradlys ◴[] No.46010820{6}[source]
Unless the cars are perfectly washed and clayed, even running a clean finger over a car is likely to introduce scratches. I just wouldn’t ever touch someone’s car.

You can look up people even trying to detail their cars to make them cleaner and end up leaving “love marks.” It doesn’t matter how soft the thing you’re using is. It’s because the car has contaminants on it and by rubbing anything on the car, those contaminants end up scratching everything. It’s like when you’re at the beach and you’re trying to remove sand off your skin. You’re probably not aggressively rubbing it off or using much pressure but it still hurts. It’s the same with cars, it’s just that the rocks aren’t as visible to you. They will leave swirls and scratches though… which become noticeable.

I’ve had people just lean against my car when it wasn’t completely clean and completely ruin the paint requiring an entire 5 stage detail.

replies(1): >>46011093 #
2. wredcoll ◴[] No.46011093[source]
> I’ve had people just lean against my car when it wasn’t completely clean and completely ruin the paint requiring an entire 5 stage detail

Assuming this is true, it seems like something has gone badly wrong somewhere in this process.

Why can't cars have paint that survives being "leaned on"