←back to thread

100 points polalavik | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ripberge ◴[] No.46009808[source]
As someone who lives in central LA and has them circle my neighborhood frequently, actually shaking my house, I think this is awesome.

These needs should be filled by drones. Way less noisy, dangerous and expensive.

replies(5): >>46009819 #>>46009855 #>>46009900 #>>46009953 #>>46010195 #
polalavik ◴[] No.46009819[source]
why LA is spending thousands/hour when drones exist is crazy.
replies(1): >>46009897 #
tcdent ◴[] No.46009897[source]
You're talking about technology that's only become realistic in the last couple years. Even then, there's probably nothing off-the-shelf that would serve the current need.

LAPD has been patrolling with helicopters for decades. I have yet to see a drone follow a car in high speed pursuit down the 5 at 100+ MPH.

replies(3): >>46009957 #>>46009986 #>>46010056 #
asdff ◴[] No.46010056[source]
Why do we need to follow a car in a high speed pursuit and force it to go 100mph on uncontrolled streets is the better question
replies(1): >>46010227 #
sokoloff ◴[] No.46010227[source]
The person “forc[ing] it to go 100mph” is in the car being chased.
replies(1): >>46010318 #
asdff ◴[] No.46010318[source]
Chased by what? It isn't a lion they are running from. It is a police interceptor egging them on to go 100mph.
replies(1): >>46010484 #
sokoloff ◴[] No.46010484[source]
I think they’re overwhelmingly being chased by a police vehicle after a lawful request to pull over and stop.

The fleeing driver is choosing to turn that lawful stop into felony fleeing/eluding if they choose to attempt to flee at triple digits.

replies(1): >>46010567 #
1. phantasmish ◴[] No.46010567{3}[source]
This is very much an “it takes two to tango” situation.

Without both of:

- A driver willing to flee the cops.

- A cop willing to chase at dangerous speeds

The high-speed chase doesn’t happen. Both make it happen.