←back to thread

100 points polalavik | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ripberge ◴[] No.46009808[source]
As someone who lives in central LA and has them circle my neighborhood frequently, actually shaking my house, I think this is awesome.

These needs should be filled by drones. Way less noisy, dangerous and expensive.

replies(5): >>46009819 #>>46009855 #>>46009900 #>>46009953 #>>46010195 #
polalavik ◴[] No.46009819[source]
why LA is spending thousands/hour when drones exist is crazy.
replies(1): >>46009897 #
tcdent ◴[] No.46009897[source]
You're talking about technology that's only become realistic in the last couple years. Even then, there's probably nothing off-the-shelf that would serve the current need.

LAPD has been patrolling with helicopters for decades. I have yet to see a drone follow a car in high speed pursuit down the 5 at 100+ MPH.

replies(3): >>46009957 #>>46009986 #>>46010056 #
kevin_thibedeau ◴[] No.46009957[source]
The MQ-8 would be cheaper to operate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Grumman_MQ-8_Fire_Sco...

replies(3): >>46009987 #>>46010256 #>>46010390 #
1. scottyah ◴[] No.46010390{4}[source]
In what way would that be cheaper to operate? You'd just replace a pilot with a few pilots and a few teams of software engineers. Maybe fuel savings?