←back to thread

55 points toomuchtodo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
j-conn ◴[] No.46010188[source]
“It’s not rocket science — you’ve either got to pay more, or you’ve got to let in way more people. … There are wonderful, caring people all over the world who would like to come care for our seniors at the wages we’re willing to pay, and we just have to let them in,” Gruber said.

This is the crux of it. The government should also subsidize and directly administer more senior care, especially given the economic drag from having family members step into these roles

replies(3): >>46010223 #>>46010307 #>>46010513 #
incompatible ◴[] No.46010307[source]
It was predicted a few decades ago by looking a demographics. Where would we be now if we hadn't had all that time to prepare?
replies(1): >>46010338 #
1. toomuchtodo ◴[] No.46010338[source]
Same spot because we made the choice to do nothing different with the lead time. At least the population compression is locked in [1], the short term pain will be dealt with regardless.

[1] https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~jesusfv/Slides_London.pdf